alkrea:

Anime only items with my new batch of 20th Anniversary toys. I finally have something for the Outer Senshi!!

alkrea:

Anime only items with my new batch of 20th Anniversary toys. I finally have something for the Outer Senshi!!

cooldadweekend:

I’m screaming it’s so cute

Ok, packed.

designofprl:

1966, ZPC Olza, obwoluta dla wafla “Prince Polo”, autor projektu: ?.
informacje z opakowania:
skład surowcowy: cukier, mąka, tłuszcz cukierniczy, jaja, mleko, kakao, kuwertura nie mniej jak 20%
masa netto: 50g
cena zł 3,60
ZN-66/MPS/G-840
Śląskie Zakłady Przemysłu Cukierniczego w Siemianowicach Śl., Zakłady “Olza” Cieszyn

designofprl:

1966, ZPC Olza, obwoluta dla wafla “Prince Polo”, autor projektu: ?.

informacje z opakowania:

  • skład surowcowy: cukier, mąka, tłuszcz cukierniczy, jaja, mleko, kakao, kuwertura nie mniej jak 20%
  • masa netto: 50g
  • cena zł 3,60
  • ZN-66/MPS/G-840
  • Śląskie Zakłady Przemysłu Cukierniczego w Siemianowicach Śl., Zakłady “Olza” Cieszyn
benjaminhargreeves:

bubonickitten:

aromantichannibal:

cenchria:

some people say there’s a red string that connects fated lovers

psa don’t look at the notes bc there are so many people completely missing the point that these are non-romantic strings of fate and making jokes about where the red string “must be” and it’s making me really angry bc we can’t even have a good artistic representation of aromanticism without people desperately grasping for a romantic interpretation somehow

like the artist has specifically requested that people stop making this about their fandoms and romance bc it’s a personal piece about aromanticism

its great i loVE IT??? we need more aromantic… anything rlly and this is really beautiful!

benjaminhargreeves:

bubonickitten:

aromantichannibal:

cenchria:

some people say there’s a red string that connects fated lovers

psa don’t look at the notes bc there are so many people completely missing the point that these are non-romantic strings of fate and making jokes about where the red string “must be” and it’s making me really angry bc we can’t even have a good artistic representation of aromanticism without people desperately grasping for a romantic interpretation somehow

like the artist has specifically requested that people stop making this about their fandoms and romance bc it’s a personal piece about aromanticism

its great i loVE IT??? we need more aromantic… anything rlly and this is really beautiful!

problackgirl:

we’ve taught girls to romanticise nearly everything a boy does. when i was younger i thought it was cute that boys chased the girl even after she said no. i loved it when after a girl moved away from a kiss, the guy would pull her back and force it on. i thought a guy saying ‘i won’t take a no for an answer’ was passionate and romantic. we’re literally always teaching girls to romanticise abusive traits.

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:


Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:

Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.

Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.

Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.
So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.